Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Real Estate
Reply to "Reasonable fees for architects vs design/build?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]There have been many threads about design-build vs architect route, I would encourage some searching. I don't think it is worth re-hashing that debate here. As to comp, it varies widely between firms. Architect fees are typically 7-8% for "average" projects, and 10-12% for "luxury" projects. Keep in mind average here means luxury anywhere else, and luxury means $2 million+ construction costs. These fees should be all-inclusive of pre-design, design, final plans, and construction oversight. Design-Build firms charge less for plans, but also charge markups and profits within the construction contract (much like a GC). DB also usually charges the fees based on total DB budget, which often includes items not included in a standard GC arrangement (like interior design, owner-supplied materials, items exceeding allowances.) That said, DB is almost always less expensive than an architect. In cases where the design aspect is somewhat limited (i.e. easy additions, build from mostly developed plans, off the shelf drawings) it is usually the most efficient way to go. In cases where you are building a true custom home, or integrating an older house into a new addition, or seeking a much stronger design aesthetic, an architect may be worth paying extra for. Each way has its advantages and disadvantages, but that is most of the difference in a nutshell.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics