Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Redrawing the boundaries: isn't Oyster perfect to move to Hardy?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think Hardy will never be an acceptable choice to Woodley Park residents, in part due to transit. Woodley Park has a Metro, Deal has a metro...Hardy has??? I really think the OOB feeder will end before Woodley gets shut out of Deal I can just see the lawsuits rolling out...[/quote] So much to work with... where to start? With what's acceptable, since that was your choice. If Hardy is acceptable enough for Key and Mann? I'll leave it to you to break down precisely what you believe "acceptable" means, but by any definition it's therefore acceptable to Woodley Park. As for your transit argument? That is silly on its face. By your logic, Amidon-Bowen ES has a Metro, Deal has a Metro, ergo Amidon-Bowen should feed Deal! Nobody cares that Oyster is about a mile away from the Woodley Park metro. That's immaterial to the fact that it's a couple of miles closer to Hardy than to Deal. It's certainly closer than Eaton, which also needs to feed Hardy. And what you think doesn't have much bearing on what politically palpable to DCPS. Even with the OOB feeders, one look at the school sizes tells quite a story. Deal needs to drop some feeders, and Shepherd isn't an option. Oyster and Eaton make so much sense that it needs to happen yesterday. (And no, I don't have a child at Shepherd)[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics