Reply to How much life insurance does DH need?

Forum Index » Money and Finances

Reply to "How much life insurance does DH need?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is DCUM, so you will hear from a lot of over-insured people.

First, you should only buy term life, not whole life or any other stuff an insurance salesperson tries to sell you.

Given the $75k salary of the spouse being insured, and the $550 mortgage, I think something in the $600k range would be reaonable. That's probably the lowest I would go, but the caveat is I'm not an expert/financial planner. That way you pay off the mortgage and you can easily cover remaining expenses with your income.

If you go to $1m on your husband, that would be plenty, for sure. That would allow you to work part-time if you needed to following his death.

On your life with the higher income, I would go higher, $1m or more. If it was me. Because he would really struggle without your income.

[/quote]

I'm the PP who wrote the above.

Re: price for $750k policy, wish I could give you good advice but I've only bought through employers with generous benefits (prices aren't comparable to private market). If I were shopping in the private market I'd call 3-4 companies and compare. Sorry I can't help more.

Re: families with one stay at home parent, if the SAHM or SAHD for whatever reason is unlikely to get a high-paying job at a moment's notice, you need to err on the side of more insurance for a given HHI, because it is totally catastrophic when the single breadwinner dies. So for example, the DW $125k + DH $0k family needs to buy more than the DW $50k + DH $75k family, in total.

Re: insuring someone with no income, it's a personal choice. In previous eras SAH was often a permanent choice after kids were born, but now it's more often temporary. At the very least, the possibility of the SAHM/D working in the future is an important safety net. Having an educated, work-ready spouse who stays at home is like an insurance policy in itself! So it's rational to insure a non-earner these days, sometimes for a lot. The more the SAH parent's future working possibilities feature in your future plans, and the higher their earning potential, the more you should insure them.

Re: buying lots of insurance when you are married but have no kids, this again is personal. Are you young? Would you remarry? Would you stay in that big house? The reason insurance with kids is so important is that you never want your spouse to be "forced" to remarry in order to support the kids, like in the 18th century! Without kids it's really more about age, what-ifs, and lifestyle choices. And if you are single, then it depends on your parents' needs in old age, and so on.

Re: whole life and its ugly cousins... as others have pointed out, this kind of product is routinely marketed to people for whom it is a bad idea: the middle class and working class. It was invented by insurance companies trying to juice their returns and capture some of the investment market. If you are very wealthy, maxing out all available savings plans (401, IRA, 529) and ALSO making the maximum gift to your children every single year, and you need additional tax-efficient transfers to your kids before your death, then maybe whole life is an option. For everyone else, you are better buying term life and investing your money some other way, like ETFs in a 401 and IRA.

If you feel like you can't get the straight goods on all of this from insurance salespeople, go to a fee-only financial advisor.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics