Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "How would this controlled choice nonsense actually work on Capitol Hill?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not to beat a dead horse, but a quick survey of Title I schools (99% FARMs according to DC) on Cap Hill reveals most students are OOB, by a large margin. Payne - 34% IB Miner - 32% IB JO Wilson - 28% IB Tyler - 26% IB Ludlow - 23% IB Watkins - 21% IB It appears that IB students effectively could be consolidated into two schools. This can be contrasted with three other nearby Title I schools *Amidon - 84% IB *Thomson - 62% IB *Walker-Jones - 68% IB Only the Hill non-Title I schools -- i.e., Brent, Maury and Peabody -- are demonstrably majority IB, likely around 60 percent by now (wivirtue vast majority of OOB Brent students culled from the surrounding Title I jurisdictions). I also understand that there is a fair amount of cross-pollination at the PS and PK levels because there are simply not enough spaces to accommodate all three and four-year olds at their IB school. Can someone explain how the targeted "controlled choice" model (I have seen reference to a two-mile radius) would work when it seems obvious that there are not nearly enough high-SES students to reach anything approaching the proposed 50/50 threshold, particulalry when there is an extant high-SES IB population queuing up for Van Ness in 2015. And how does all of this play out with SWS and CHM in the mix? I would like to dismiss all of this as yet more horse manure but nothing surprises me any more. [/quote] But aren't you looking at the wrong numbers? I would think that the TOTAL number of IB kids would be more relevant as opposed to the number that are actually attending. For example, aren't large numbers of kids who are IB for Watkins opting out? The theory is based in part, at least as I understand it, on recapturing those IB students who are going charter/private/OOB. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics