Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "Embryo Grading Question"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]> but wow is this a money making and stats-drive business. And our bodies and wallets pay dearly for it. Oh I hear you here. On my last cycle, DE, I asked the doctor to ask the lab to be liberal on freezing. From experience on other forums, it's clear that "embryo grading" is too subjective to be a valuable tool. When people have their embryos tested, there is almost no correlation to how they look, and which are genetically normal. Gorgeous embryos can be trisomy, fragmented ones can be normal. I don't buy the explanations. One of the reasons I went to GW is that they'll freeze anything for you. I didn't want any of my embryos to be tossed. Mine were frozen day 2, and transferred day 3. They survived the thaw and divided, and looked like any other day 3 embryos. At my age, we weren't getting to blast, so this gave me a chance at another cycle without the full meds and retrieval. It didn't work but helped me feel every egg of mine they got was getting a chance. In retrospect I wish I'd put in all my embryos at once but that's the 20/20 hindsight, because it turns out none were viable in either cycle. Unless they're doing genetic testing, or there's NO inner cell mass, the "standards" are BS, in my opinion. And Shady Grove's frozen success rate is not that high, it only supports the fact that their standards are not true predictors of success. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics