Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Baby stealing approved in South Carolina!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]The dad asked the mother to marry him after he found out she was pregnant. She refused. She made an adoption plan and did not inform him of it at all. She knew that his Native American affiliation would cause an issue with the adoption, so she gave the wrong name and birthdate (seems intentionally) of the father to the tribal authorities. There was no record of his affiliation as a result, so the baby was able to be moved from Oklahoma to South Carolina. Corrupt attorneys were involved it seems, as they bypassed a federal law intended to protect Native kids and prevent this type of scenario. Birthmother also hid the birth from him and was on a no contact list at the hospital, making it impossible for him to even track her down. Then the adoption was kept from him until 4 months later when he was about to be deployed to Iraq. Dad signed the papers thinking it was to give custody over to the mother, the second he realized that he signed a consent to the adoption he tried to retieve the papers from the process server...when unable to do so, he contacted an attorney immediately. He has fought to get his kid since she was 4 months old. The adoptive parents used the legal system to keep the kid away for 27 months. I'm sure it was traumatic for the kid to leave the pre-doptive home as a 2 year old. It will be even more traumatic to leave her father now at almost age 4. This was a contested adoption from the beginning, the Capobianco's should have given the child back as an infant and saved all parties involved alot of heartache. The birthmother seems to have a vendetta against the father and used this kid as a pawn to hurt him. She also got over 10,000 from the adoptive parents and they paid for her attorney (conflict of interest?). Just because this dad may not be as wealthy, or educated as the adoptive couple, he should not have to loose his kid. He made a mistake, especially during the pregnancy, but it seems more like it was a messy relationship between the birth parent's. He loves the child, and wants her and is providing for her. He is not unfit and the kid is not in need of a family. She is now attatched to him and her extended family. When she grows up I am sure she will be resentful, now matter how much money and priviledge the adoptive family will raise her with. She was denied her real family, her roots and no money can buy her that. She will be forever scarred by this. Adoption should be about finding parents for a child who needs a home. Not finding a child for greedy, selfish people who will stop at nothing to get their hands on someone else's children.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics