Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Minimum Wage = Living Wage?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=AroundTheBlock][quote=Anonymous]Should the minimum wage for an area be a living wage for that area? Does it matter if it's a 16 year old living at home who's applying to sweep floors at Jiffy Lube, or a 25 year old living on his own applying for that same job? If you think the minimum wage should be a living wage, should it be a living wage for one person, a person supporting a family with another person making a similar wage, a person supporting a family on his own? Should the wage depend on the circumstances of the job (e.g. training required) or the circumstances of the person (e.g. 16 yr old vs single mother of 2)?[/quote] No. You cannot apply that theory because each area is different. Sorry, but I do not believe the government should try and make everyone's life more comfortable. If you work in Fairfax but live in PG should you get paid more money? Also, paying a person because they have kids or don't have kids is segregation. It's not my fault, problem or issue that an employee of mine has kids and another one does not. Work is work. Do the job and stop feeling like people should be entitled to the easy life. EDIT: Also, if business owners had to pay people based on a "living wage" then they would hire people who don't have a high wage requirement. Thus, it would be worse for the "mother with two kids".[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics