Reply to Unschooling demystified

Forum Index » Schools and Education General Discussion

Reply to "Unschooling demystified"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So tell me . . .

How does one go on to become a doctor or a veterinarian or a nurse w/o schooling?

After all, isn't college also a microcosm of society?  the next step after elementary and secondary in "brainwashing the masses?"

Until society beaks down, my kids will attend school, and I will continue to brainwash the masses!

OP, if this impresses you, you're a fool.

[/quote]

I feel ridiculous arguing with someone who hasn't read the page in question, but in a nutshell: unschooling doesn't mean not learning. It's a different approach to learning, ie. "interest driven, child-led, natural, organic, eclectic, or self-directed learning." So, to use your example, if a child has an interest in being a doctor, they would apply themselves to learning the things they need to reach their goal. But there's no reason that learning has to happen in a school environment, until that kid reaches the level of college and med school ... and then only because (I assume) attending those institutions is a requirement for getting a medical license.

There are so many resources nowadays; it's not all up to the parents to teach. There are all sorts of centers that offer a-la-carte classes, as well as books, the Khan Academy, and online K-12 classes offered by the likes of Stanford and GW (children can pick and choose those that are relevant to them). I've been reading many accounts of unschoolers going on to attend colleges with great success; in fact, many start taking college classes well before they reach 18. Heck, I noticed that Stanford even has a page devoted to homeschool college admissions now ([url]http://admission.stanford.edu/basics/requirements/home_school.html[/url]). [/quote]

This would do such a disservice to a child that cannot make choices like this for himself at a young age.  If a child is focused on etymology but disregards other less interesting subjects, that's a problem (for him).  I have no issue with a child spending EXTRA time on a loved topic; I object to it being exclusive time on a lived topic, not having a well rounded curriculum, etc.[/quote]

OP here. I had the same thought at first, but I've been reading a lot of discussions about this topic since it piqued my interest, and I personally no longer have this concern. The unschooling philosophy makes the child the driver of his or her education, and it involves trusting them to make the choices that are right for them. It also requires the parents to let go of ideas about what someone else "should" learn, in what order, and by what age. From what I've been reading (statistics and anecdotes), it works, in the sense that it helps children develop into self-fulfilled, well-adjusted adults. For example, I found a gallery of interviews with grown-ups who had been unschooled. I tried to find it again just now but couldn't readily track it down, but they came across as very mature, confident, motivated, self-aware and satisfied with their lives, I suppose because they'd been given the freedom to make a lot of their own choices and really own their failures and accomplishments.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics