Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "S/O: Women bosses supporting other women... Do I owe it to feminism to offer work-at-home option?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]In my office, we are all pretty flexible about allowing working from home for sick kid, cable guy, home renovations, etc. However, no one has a standing work-from-home arrangement 1-2 days a week, although many people would probably take advantage if it were offered. Recently a very junior person (only here about 6 months; in a fairly junior, support role) requested a 1-2/day week telework arrangement after she returns from maternity leave. The boss said no, based on the fact that no one else has this arrangement-- but many people would probably want it and it would not be fair. This is not a big facetime kind of job, but it is a tight-knit office and no one would argue that the office dynamic would be the same if everyone started working at home (see Yahoo banning telework). Although to be fair, this person probably *could* do her job from home a few days/ week, but people generally expect people in this junior role to be around. Do you think this is contrary to feminist principles not to allow a permanent 1-2 day/wk work at home arrangement for this employee? I have no dog in the fight, just an observer. However, part of me does think that this employee has not "paid her dues" to be entitled to this kind of benefit. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics