Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "FxAT vs. Cogat testing this year"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We all know that the percentiles of younger kids were affected but nobody can say if a FxAT of 85% non-age-adjusted from an August-born kid would be a 90% or even a 99% if age-normed. The committee members are people too, and therefore, will be differently affected by an 80% score vs. a 90%, even being fully aware that the new scores are normed in FC and not adjusted for age.[/quote] +1[/quote] My late August-born brother tested off the charts his entire life even though he was almost always the youngest in his class (redshirting wasn't the rage it was back then since parents weren't quite so crazy about micromanaging their kids lives and winning some imaginary race to I don't even know what). All this whining is ridiculous. A smart kid is going to stand out and as others have noted likely be identified by the multitude of other data points. The lack of faith and insecurity on these forums is beyond belief. Please get over yourselves! We are typically talking about 7 and 8 year olds here.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics