Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Final election evaluation"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Frumin, then Silverman. Redd wasn't a serious Green Party candidate; his positions on key issues were idiosyncratic and not at all consistent with the Green Party. Weed Guy: if all he wanted to do was stir up controversy, he should have picked a controversial issue. How about next time he runs as an evangelical atheist (ha ha)? That would at least make for some fun debates. Mara: overgrown frat boy and everyone knows it. And he's starting to look like perennial candidate Vincent Orange: just run for everything till you win one! Was there ever a satisfactory explanation for why he wouldn't release his tax returns or name his clients as a consultant? And how do you accrue enough cash selling Republican memorabilia on ebay to buy a house in one of the country's priciest real estate markets? Bond: the automaton corporate candidate. Big surprise.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
