Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "SCOTUS to hear another Affirmative Action Case."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] but ivies already pretty much use formulaic assessments such as AI. No one on this thread has said anything about income/class. But income/class is NOT what is being used as much as it should be right now as race is being used as a inaccurate and lazy proxy for it. As for your second part about oos/instate, because of tuition impact of the differing tracks (and even some state laws in some states stipulate what mix of oos/instate is allowed) there are explicit quotas set that are more transparent to the applying public. UC's have moved to more 'holisitic' reading of apps after prop 209, but the basics of prop 209 have worked in making the UC's more transparent in who gets in. Personally, if Ivies and other private top 25's want to have 'unwritten quotas' like they do now, I'm ok with it...AS LONG AS THEY ARE TRANSPARENT. In their common data sets every year, along with the demographic data of the student body, and the overall class percentiles for scores and gpa, schools should be forced to release the breakdown of apps received by race, gender, and household income. Also medians and percentile ranges of ACCEPTED and ATTENDING students by race, gender, and family income should be released. Schools love touting diversity in their class, but refuse to release the same granularity in demographics about their applicant, accepted, and attending pools. [/quote] I think we agree that diversity based on income/class is a good thing. I also like your idea of transparency. I do wonder, however, if publishing SATs and GPAs for students for race/gender/income will make things worse, not better. No school wants to reveal a 200-300 gap between one subgroup of students and another subgroup of students, if nothing else because of the questions it raises about admissions practices. So to close this gap, because income and SATs/GPAs are highly correlated, schools are going to accept more high-SES minorities, not more low-SES minorities. I guess if you released family income by subgroup this would help a bit, but I'm not sure it solves the problem.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics