Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "More evidence that 2.0 and Starr is backward looking "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My first grader has "ability grouping" for both reading (groups in class) and math (switches to another class). [/quote] This isn't what the OP is talking about. Prior to 2.0 entire classes were pulled out for math. For example, in second grade there was an entire class (or more) doing third or fourth grade math. With 2.0 that is gone.[/quote] The OP posted links to two articles referencing a study on "the resurgence of ability grouping." The OP apparently did so in order to argue that "Starr is backward looking." As a rebuttal, I indicated that my son has plenty of ability grouping under the current system. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
