Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "SWS - as an IB School? L-T prospects?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So it needs to be Prospect neighbors leading the charge, not SWS. That should be do-able. And I think it's clear there won't be a true IB catchment option, just a proximity preference which helps keep SWS a Hill school but also gives them more control over enrollment. Yes?[/quote] But if there's proximity preference, then essentially it will become in IB school for everyone around LT. You're making a distinction without a difference.[/quote] Oh, but there is a difference. Whatever is ultimately going to happen with LT to either fix it, close it, or leave it to linger as is in perpetuity is going to happen with or without a proximity preference for SWS and it isn't going to happen soon. For those of us IB who are tired of waiting around for a new principal or something else to bring drastic change to that school, there's a real opportunity now to have at least increased access to a successful ES that wants to continue its long tradition as part of the Hill community. No one wants to have the fight with LT, Maury, the Cluster or any other school whose boundaries would be impacted by carving out a neighborhood catchment for Prospect. Proximity is a win-win for neighbors and SWS, and LT will continue being what LT has been for decades and DCPS seems perfectly happy with. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics