Reply to VA SCOTUS oral arguments

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "VA SCOTUS oral arguments"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://x.com/kencuccinelli/status/2049152470471844222?s=46&t=R0sFrGNc8GH_7llJGM-81g[/twitter]

Major Virginia Redistricting Case update:

The Virginia Supreme Court (#SCOVA) has DENIED the emergency request to stay the injunction of certification of last week's Gerrymandering referendum!

In the 'tea leaves' category, this is as positive a 'tea leaf' as one might imagine!

If #SCOVA thought they would let the referendum stand, then logically they would have lifted the injunction on counting & certifying the votes.

Caveat: this is still just tea leaves, but it's a good sign.

@Kalshi & @Polymarket are probably crashing on this at the moment :)

@ETI_now[/quote]

Cuccinelli might end up being right, but not because he's smart. The VA Supreme Court could have denied for any number of reasons unrelated to the merits, including that there's no irreparable harm from waiting a little while longer for the actual decision. That guy was the AG at one point? Yikes.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics