Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "Recruiting Question"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Given that every year I’ve watched high school lacrosse a number of highly committed players look relatively average by the end of junior year or senior year and a number of mid or uncommitted players end up looking better, why don’t teams hold open more roster spots open to scoop up players towards the end of high school. Similarly, how come you don’t see more five star type players wait until the end of high school when they can better assess the roster to commit. You see this in basketball and football where a lot of five star players commit senior year (although some commitments are made much earlier). Why is lacrosse different in the sense that nearly everyone on both the player and the coach side go all in on commitments the summer before junior year? Is it just a collective action problem? And if so, how come the revenue sports don’t have the same issue? This is an earnest question. I’m not trying to denigrate anyone who commits or does not commit early. It just seems weird that lacrosse is so different than basketball and football in terms of timeline. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics