Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Website Feedback
Reply to "Why do you allow pro Iranian poster to dominate most political threads?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Starting from 23:49 (at least) on this thread, we have post after post from the same truly deranged Jew-hating nut job. I’m honestly not sure how these posts can be defended. Funny how this poster is never called out by the moderators. She is absolutely repulsive. https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/15/1320204.page[/quote] I read the thread rest of the thread. There is one poster who is extremely emotional and whose language could clearly be better, but there is no "Jew-hating". There is extreme anger and disgust with Israel. I should not have to remind you that "Israel" and "Jews" and not synonymous. [/quote] DP. We all know the poster the PP is referring to and the fact that you merely excuse her as "extremely emotional" is astounding. She is completely toxic and one-sided, not to mention truly unhinged. "Her language could be better"? Are you joking? She says the most vile things in every longwinded post. Amazing that you don't delete *her* posts on sight, but the fact that you don't tells us you agree with her extremely biased and hateful POV. Would you allow similar threads to stand if we simply replaced her constant "Zionist pig" language with "Islamic / Iranian pigs"? No, you'd ban whoever wrote that. Why aren't you banning her? Additionally, you deleted a thread this morning detailing how Iranians are using children as young as 12 in dangerous security positions. The source was the BBC. Why did you delete that? Especially interesting because you allow other, much less important threads to stand, such as "Bullet that killed Kirk doesn’t match the rifle" - sourced from the always truthful Daily Mail. That could have been included on the existing thread about Charlie Kirk but you apparently see no reason not to start a new thread about him.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics