Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Kids With Special Needs and Disabilities
Reply to "ISO recs for adhd/learning disabilities testing that isn't just churning out diagnoses"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Stixrud is most definitely not a diagnosis machine. Dr. Henderson was very cautious when diagnosing my children. One has very obvious ADHD/ASD, was diagnosed at a young age, had free services from MoCo before preschool, and got an IEP as soon as he entered K. The other we thought might have very mild ADHD, but we weren't sure. We got her tested as a teen, because she had been doing well. It turns out she has autism, not ADHD, and there are no accommodations to expect for school - she doesn't need extra time, or anything else. She meets *some criteria* for inattention, but not sufficiently to get a diagnosis. I highly recommend Dr. Henderson at Stixrud.[/quote] I ditto this, although we used a different Stixrud doctor. Very cautious. Extensive testing. Did not use some testing that might have led to another diagnosis because DCs answers on it were so contradictory that she felt it was no longer a valid instrument but did discuss pros and cons exhibited by the instrument. WTF do you mean by "diagnosis machine" any way, OP? Psychoeducational and neuropsychological assessments are typically two days and many tests. Our DC had a dozen different tests spanning IQ and achievement across all categories plus other processing, memory and language testing. Any doctor who sees results that are consistent with a diagnosis has an ethical duty to make the diagnosis. I have never once over more than a decade of assessments seen a "diagnosis" from an assessment that wasn't supported by extensive objective data backed up by clinical, parental and/or educational observations. "Diagnosis machine" is just a way to discriminate against people with disabilities by minimizing their healthcare findings. I don't see people referring to men who see doctors for Viagra or testosterone as having gone to a "diagnosis machine," because we don't stigmatize those problems in the same way. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics