Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Expending large resources to rescue people from optional recreation "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Agree with PP, where could the line be drawn? Any activity by choice? Riding a bike, ice skating, basketball. The likelihood of injury is higher is some mild activities than extreme ones. Ability to help should not be withheld because one ornery busybody disagrees with saving others.[/quote] Skiing and snowmobiling "back country" trails seems like a pretty clear line. And yes, [b]the Grand Canyon absolutely COULD put up signs in the summer saying hiking is closed for the day and anyone hiking anyway will NOT be rescued. [/b] It doesn't have to be a slippery slope or moral judgement. State in advance what is NOT happening and why. [/quote] Ok, but what about the day that is below the temperature threshold so the park is open but Bob is overweight and doesn't bring any water so Bob faints on the trail? You're acting like you can draw these lines in the sand and you can't. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
