Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "What does tabling the SSIMS closure mean for the boundary options?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]The community is not rallying around a "dangerous building." It's rallying around making investments in the current school rather than creating two huge middle schools. It's saying that no one has looked at the traffic and safety implications of all the increased buses in the neighborhood. It's saying the timing for this was incredibly rushed and MCPS has not looked into other holding school options. It's saying Taylor and his team can't just push through a school closure without talking to the people most affected about it. And also, if the building is so unsafe, how is it safe for a holding school? The community is saying this didn't make sense and is asking questions that all of us should be asking as well. I agree that there are a ton of unanswered questions re the boundary study and SSIMS. MCPS is rushing so fast that it's causing tons of confusion. But that is not the SSIMS community's fault. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
