Reply to If the writing test stated Do Not Use AI ...

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "If the writing test stated Do Not Use AI ... "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is not a job for someone who's good at prompts. Sure, there are jobs for prompt-writers, but this is a job for an [i]actual writer.[/i] We need to stand out in a field where all our competition sounds the same.

Yes, the checkers can be wrong, but that isn't a reason to stop using them, it's a reason to do multiple checks and to assess the results with a critical eye. So if Candidate A was 100% AI across all tools, only an idiot would say "but but but the checkers could be wrong!" Same with Candidate B, who was 0% AI across all tools. Why on earth would I look at that and say "hmmm this reads like a human to me and to the tools, but the checkers could be wrong!" Candidate C, now... Candidate C might have 10% on one tool, 0% on another tool, and 15% on the last tool. I'll assume that candidate C used an AI for formatting or similar, and if their other criteria were strong, not dismiss them automatically. [/quote]

Couple of quick comments:

1.  They have copied and pasted excerpts from the Bible and famous novels (can't remember which) and all the AI checkers said they were 100% AI; and
2.  Are your candidates literally f**king idiots?  Any 15 year old knows to run their work through all the prominent AI checkers and you can literally change 1 or 2 words and go from 100% AI to 0% AI.

I suppose #2 is the reason to reject them right there...however, just understand that what I wrote in #2 is true.  You may end up hiring someone who in fact used AI, but knew the tricks so it came out 0% AI from the checkers.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics