Reply to Media mum about the Charlie Kirk assisination and trial

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Media mum about the Charlie Kirk assisination and trial"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Because we don't care.[/quote]

That's fine to have that opinion as long it's not because of some blind loyalty to foreign entities.

However, if it's shown in court that a) Tyler Robinson's lawyers are running a sham defense; b) evidence that should have been admitted is either withheld or "lost"; or c) any of the witnesses (possibly Patel, Zinn, TPUSA staff, TPUSA security, local Utah people like Cox, Lyman, local TPUSA students, etc.) are misleading or pleading the Fifth, will you think otherwise? Should you think otherwise? This case is probably going to get the most scrutiny since OJ.

There are several high profile cases of impropriety by US attorneys, the alphabet agencies, and local law enforcement that the media isn't talking about, either. Butler, PA sniper. W Palm Beach golf course moron. Gov Whitmer kidnappers. To name a few. So, if this case is a little fishy, are you going to say it's still just one bad apple, Who cares?

And I hope you're not one of those crying about the ICE sh!tshow and looking the other way on this.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics