Reply to Kash Patel assigns FBI take force to guarding/stalking his sugar baby

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Kash Patel assigns FBI take force to guarding/stalking his sugar baby"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't like most of what Patel has been doing but [b]I'm ok with this[/b]. We can't have the director of the FBI potentially compromised because something has happened to his significant other.

Yes, I know, I know, he's already compromised...[/quote]
Neither Christopher Wray or James Comey's wives had personal protection details when they headed the FBI. But this cross-eyed, traitorous, bastard's girlfriend gets protective details. WTF is wrong with you people. Some of yall make excuses for the worse criminals.[/quote]

You are correct. I fact checked this and this was the response:

[quote]The wives or girlfriends of past FBI directors have not received an FBI protective detail in the same way. While spouses have occasionally gotten protection—typically when traveling with the director or sharing a residence (e.g., Christopher Wray's wife Helen had security only during joint travel)—current and former officials report no precedent for a standalone detail for a non-cohabiting girlfriend.[/quote]
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics