Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Why did they linked the programming analysis to the boundary study? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]The slides you share are very interesting. The December 5, 2024 deck says it’s literally outside the scope of work for FLO to conduct a program analysis. It says staff will develop a scope of work for analysis of equitable distribution of MCPS program offerings across the district that will run concurrently with the boundary study. So according to that, the only programmatic work that should have been conducted was a scope of work for a program analysis. There is nothing in there about these things being “inextricably linked.” These documents make it sound like the programmatic work would follow after the boundary work, which makes way more sense. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
