Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "NYT on "boundaries" instead of telework"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Anyone else find this article really problematic? https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/02/opinion/women-work-force-flexibility-shifts.html How can the author completely ignore that complete RTO was the first tool that DOGE used to try to drive people out with the Fork, VERAs, dissolving unions and CBAs, etc? So obviously yes telework is something people care about and that can be used as a weapon. Second the nurse example seems ridiculous. Plenty of people stay in jobs because they need $, that doesn't mean the work life balance is actually great or working for them. Many in healthcare don't feel like it's a workplace model that should be emulated by other fields needlessly. This feels like a corporate shill with "research" to support the flexibilities that are being rolled back all over. "Boundaries" is so vague that any company can claim that's their culture instead of offering something tangible like a known hybrid expectation. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
