Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Gen-ed requirements: part of a well-rounded liberal arts education or high school 2.0?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes, Chicago is of course known for its very serious education. I think the [b]"AP = college credit" approach is wrongheaded and a missed opportunity. It shouldn't be seen as a means to get the degree faster. Instead they can just skip some survey courses and take more advanced classes.[/b] AP is mostly stuff that a good secondary school system would teach anyway. You can't get AP to get advanced standing at Yale, Columbia, Chicago etc. because the gen ed courses are more rigorous than AP courses.[/quote] yes yes yes. Students should make use of their 4 years to get to the most advanced courses they can take, depth and breadth. Ivies Chicago and the like are structured to be 4-years for this reason. More and more, internships care about coursework completed. Jobs definitely do. Grad school cares a lot, as does med school! AMCAS lists minimum required courses as well as suggested courses, in a table by med school. The top med schools expect premeds to take all suggested upper levels and more! Course rigor plus research with faculty is how one stands out among a sea of 3.9/515+ students all gunning for the top 20 med schools which have the widest variety of subspecialty exposure and the most cutting edge treatments. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics