Reply to What’s the deal with Amherst?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "What’s the deal with Amherst?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Tiny, mediocre campus in a lackluster town.[/quote]
Opinion. 
[quote=Anonymous] No academic highlights (like Williams tutorial, Swarthmore Honors, etc).[/quote]
Open curriculum? Consortium?
[quote=Anonymous] 
Racial and socioeconomic diversity on paper, but every group sticks with themselves.[/quote]
I'm always surprised when I see this repeated here. DC's friend group looks like it was made for a brochure.
[quote=Anonymous] 
Snobby, condescending students who think they're big shots. This struck us because the students we met at Yale and Brown were so much more friendly and humble.[/quote]
Opinion.
[quote=Anonymous] 
They tout small classes but only 62% are under 20 students- every other top ranked SLAC and nearly every top 20 university is ahead of them.[/quote]
Nice cherrypicking. They're ahead of Williams and Swarthmore on under 30. Either way, the "advantages" the other schools have are rounding errors.
[quote=Anonymous] 
They themselves said few utilize the 5 College consortium, so that's a moot benefit.[/quote]
The benefit also takes the form of being in a real college town with sports games, bars, and an actual full selection of amenities.[/quote]
The consortium is not a real benefit and few students use it. I don't know why people on DCUM still are lying about this when it's common knowledge at this point. If you want a consortium that bad, go to the Claremont schools or whatever they are.
What percent of LAC classes even have 30 students?[/quote]Did you read the post?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics