Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "YCBK Podcast Episode re College Admissions' use of AI Detection Programs"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Almost all essays will end up being 40-80% probability of having been generated by AI. Then AO's do what? They ignore the flags. [/quote] Definitely not. This is wrong. If you haven't used AI at all, pangram and originality (which you pay for) will show mostly green (less than 10%) AI. Mostly it will say 100% human. I'm an IEC and run all my clients' stuff through my paid versions where the material is not shared for training purposes. I pay large sums for this privacy feature. Anything that shows up more than 12% AI, I get suspicious. Then, when I probe with the students and ask for first drafts, yes, they did use AI for that draft (plus you can tell - honestly, I read so many of these - I'll know which ones are 50%+ AI before I run them). Note that you can put them through QuillBot, gptzero, and zerogpt, and it will say 0% AI. Those detectors are not useful. The technology will only get better. It's a slippery slope, and I have zero tolerance. Yes, Slate now has the AI detector interface for the entire Common App. There was a presentation about this at our meeting in Ohio last month. Probably visuals online at this point.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics