Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Beauty and Fashion
Reply to "Kardashian era is over?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]2025 is the year that 90s heroine chic came back to the runways at all the big fashion shows, and a lot of online retailers that bragged about inclusive models have shifted to frighteningly skinny models again - like the 2000s. There are a few theories, but one is that we're in the ozempic era where everyone can be skinny and we don't have to pretend to like fat bodies anymore (just re-stating what i've read, not supporting it). I've definitely noticed the shift to stick figure bodies in the ads i get through my algorithm. My prediction is that this trend will take hold in the next few years as the 'new' preferred body type, the Kardashians will all get more surgery to adjust to the new norm. They've already adjusted previous surgeries to stay with trends, so wouldn't be odd to have their boob or butt implants downgraded to smaller implants. And they'll shift their make up strategies to something less heavy (but still tons of makeup - because they gotta sell products). And then we'll be forced to see a million headlines quoting Kim about how important it is to love your natural body. [/quote] I personally think the ultra thin body type is more realistic than a Kardashian body. Some people really are naturally very thin. Other people do diet/exercise down to unhealthy levels. But the Kardashian body is pretty much impossible to achieve without surgery. Not saying we should all aspire to be ultra thin, but the idea that the Kardashian era was somehow healthier or more inclusive is nonsense. It only embraced curves so long as they involved impossibly narrow waists and as long as those curves completely defied gravity. It's a cartoon body. Whereas some model who happens to be 5'10" while having no boobs and no butt probably just happens to look like that, she didn't pay for it. Yes her body is unattainable to normal people but that's ALWAYS true of models, simply being shorter make it impossible for most of us to achieve that appearance even if we have similar body types. Is fashion going to embrace models who are 5'4" soon? No.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics