Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "41 players on a U12 roster"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]When we first started soccer, we were told that the roster would be fluid. And for the games that upcoming weekend, a roster would be put out so families knew what game they were playing. This lasted all of one week. They quickly identified who they wanted, and what team and besides having maybe a guest player here and there there was no movement. I don’t know the logistics behind the teams, but my understanding is that rosters have to be submitted at least at a certain age group so how can the team is be so fluid when you have 41 players? Sounds to me like they are trying to tell you that’s what they do and they evaluate players weekly, but that might not be what’s going on. And maybe there’s a parent who is a team manager that can chime in.[/quote] We have a couple of kids who play travel soccer with very different skill level. We've brought both to practices and tryouts at various clubs. The better one, usually the same day, we are told that he will be on the top team. Although we never acted on that verbal assessment and always assumed there was no offer unless it was in writing. And yes, the written offer did quickly come. The other kid, always dead silence after the practices or tryouts. Or, this spiel about fluid rosters, or we can't tell you yet which team he'll be rostered on because we have to wait and see which players come back, etc. I share this perspective because unless your kid has been quickly told they are on a particular team, just assume the worse. I have also talked to a few coaches for top teams and they've all said that they are always in close contact with the coach of the second team (no idea about coaches under that) to see if players can be moved up. However, all universally believe there is a large gap between the first and second teams. One coach admitted that they are more likely to play up a first team player if there is a need rather than pull up a second team player. [b]There are very, very few clubs in the DMV area that pull from their second team. And even then, it's tough for a second team player to be moved up and work their way up on to the starting lineup. I have seen it happen but the odds aren't great. I think there are more efficient ways to get on a first team rather than rely on being promoted from the second team but I'm sure families have constraints like location that prevents them from trying other clubs and scenarios.[/b] Good luck everyone![/quote] +1 good advice. If clubs were honest about it, it wouldn't be a problem. But don't believe the "fluid roster" or similar claims about second-team players moving up to first team or being given first-team game opportunities. It just doesn't happen. If a club wanted your kid to play on the first team, they'd have placed him on the first team. Instead, clubs dangle the lie about "fluid rosters" in front of second team players/parents to entice them to write the check and sign up for the second team. It's all about money. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics