Reply to Haycock - what about the kids who are not in the AAP program?

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Haycock - what about the kids who are not in the AAP program?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
There are too many now in AAP to call it serving a need.  I have been a parent of a child at a large center so please stop with the BS.  Haycock and Longfellow were/are the center of the world for some.  I would not be surprised if some schools remain at Longfellow and don't have to go to AAP at Cooper.  Franklin Sherman despite being a split feeder to Langley [plus closer] didn't get sent to Churchill.  Odd.  [/quote]

Of course, some schools will continue to feed into Longfellow AAP.  Why wouldn't they?  However, if a new AAP center is opened at Cooper, as seems likely, the projections are that it will take the kids from the Langley pyramid currently at Longfellow and Kilmer, eventually be larger than the AAP centers at Longfellow or Kilmer.

Sherman is a split McLean/Langley feeder, but it's in the McLean pyramid, so it's not surprising that Sherman kids would be assigned to Haycock AAP.  Kent Gardens was reassigned to Churchill Road AAP when Haycock got overcrowded a few years ago.  Kent Gardens is also in the McLean pyramid, but it's a much larger school than Sherman, so moving the KG AAP kids to Churchill Road provided more relief to Haycock.

We could debate about whether the requirements for AAP programs should be stricter, but why are you so nasty about the entire topic? Talk about odd! 
  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics