Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Masking in public law?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I haven't visited a bank branch in a few years. I had to go in recently and noticed they have a big sign on the door that states: No masks can be worn inside the bank in accompaniment of sunglasses. There's also a secondary sign stating that "gaiter" type masks are banned in the bank. I didn't know what a gaiter was and had to Google afterwards. That's the type that the ICE agents are wearing that cover 1/2 their face, ears, and neck. As someone said above, IMO, the mask issue is like the fake service dog issue. All someone needs to do is say it's for medical reasons and they can wear one. There's no proof needed because of privacy laws. Why can't we say you can wear a mask, but if you're wearing a mask, you can't wear a hood, sunglasses, and a hat as well indoors. Or ban those gaiter masks and only allow medical-type masks. The CA law they are trying to pass has an exception for medical masks so all those ICE agents will just switch to that style. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
