Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Isn't it Ironic"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]JP Morgan revealed the results of internal Employee Satisfaction survey. Number one complain they want more internal work mobility meaning promotions and transfers to new jobs. Then complaints number two and three is they want to work from home more and have more flexible work hours. If I am Jamie Dimon I would be confused. My staff wants promotions and increased responsibilities but don't want to come to the office or work regular hours. How do I implement this. Full disclosure I worked at Chase way back when Jaimie started as CEO. Very very political and internal transfers occur by networking, working with other areas, going to meeting other areas so when an opportunity comes up they know who you are. In remote you just focus on your work at hand in a silo. I dont know how it works to move up quickly and get transfers without going to work. And everyone fear full of talking in emails or on camera. Over coffee or in hallway only time you get real deal there. [/quote] Jamie Dimon needs to figure out how to reconcile all three complaints, because no one is going back to the old ways. If he’s too stupid to figure out how to do that, he’s welcome to lose people to his competitors who do figure it out.[/quote] Citigroup is only big bank in NY that is partially WFH at two days a week. The stock is under performing and they had a few major losses as a direct result of remote work in pandemic. The underperforming stock is an issue as employees get a lot of stock RSUs that vest over time. It you got 100K of JPM stock 5 years ago today you have $268,000. If you got 100K of Citigroup stock five years ago you would have $149,000. As you can see that two days a week WFH is expensive. But banks give stock every year so over time a massive difference in wealth if you work at a poorer performing bank .Goldman if you got $100k of stock five year you would have $306,000 today. GS and JPM is 5 day in office. Citi is not. My brief time at JPM I have $750,000 in stock today as it just keeps going up. I dont work there but they work like dogs there and stock keeps going up. [/quote] I trust what you say 0%. You are a known bloviator here, and when you are not spouting misogynistic or racist tropes, you sound drunk. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics