Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Being competent in federal service work is trying"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Your entire first paragraph applies completely to my 25 years of employment in corporate America. I was a fed in DC for 8 years before grad school. My fed co-workers were equally talented to the corporate workers I'm surrounded by now. Corporate work pays more but indeed there has been less job security. Also there are many people in corporate life who have no interest in the greater good AND also have no incentive to give any lip service to that ideal. Don't believe what people say about the private sector being magically more efficient and productive. A lot of that is self-serving political rhetoric. As you know, many people only support the parts of government that they personally like and benefit from.[/quote] This is not OP. I am not anti Fed. I am not anti goverment. I should clarify, I do not think the federal workforce is characterized by incompetence, it is just that those who are incompetent or toxic are not managed well in a way that protects other employees. [/quote] PP. You'd be surprised how long incompetent and toxic people can survive in corporate environments. I'm talking big companies. In general, as long as the boss likes you and there are no clear productivity metrics, and the company is making money, there is no incentive to cut staff. [b]Lots of corporate staff have no clear productivity metrics. Or let me phrase it as...they have shared accountability. Like that phrase "Success has many fathers." Failure is nobody's sole responsibility.[/b][/quote] Please explain, I am confused, how does this relate to my post (OP), I am 100% not being snarky, honest question, just want to understand your insight, thanks![/quote] PP. I see corporate people rewarded and praised even though nothing of substance has actually been done. I see people get promoted for energetic work on projects that are cancelled so the net effect of their work on the company's profitability is zero. I see people who care and work hard get laid off even though I know there are other people who coast, take advantage of all their perks, and stay in the same job for decades. I see people who do quality work internally underemployed and deprioritized because they aren't fun to hang out with. I see people who seem to understand sexism and implicit bias maintain a departmental structure where men have all the cushy, easy senior positions. In other words, human behavior is similar everywhere. Interpersonal politics are often more important than doing really good work. Speaking up is praised but not really rewarded unless you are part of the in-crowd. Also people's definition of competence has a lot to do with whether you are a pain in the ass to them. People tend to dislike competent people who make them do, or feel like they have to do, things they do not want to do. When I was in my MBA program, and finishing a group paper, with three hours to go, one of our team members showed up to let us know they didn't write their three pages because they needed to get ready for and depart for a flight. No warning in advance. Just failure to do the work. So, I did what I could to fill and patch the hole. One of my male team members told me that "I just needed to relax my expectations". I've always remembered that, because it added insult to injury. I took on extra work because the grade and the completeness of the paper mattered to me. But telling hardworking people to lower their expectations and mesh better with slackers is not a rare response. I've run across it since then. My point is that if you are having trouble with slackers, and incompetent managers in government, you won't necessarily escape them by going private sector. Especially if you head for a closely related business to what you work on in government. A lot of managers everywhere are just doing it for pay and promotions. They don't actually care to manage people.[/quote] Ok then, you are just telling me to understand the dynamic and be more a team player. Yes, I have heard this before, hence my OP post. You are repeating what I am already being told to leadership at work. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics