Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Swimming and Diving
Reply to "NVSL “Swim Team Only” memberships — are these legal under NVSL Bylaws?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The rules exist, largely, to prevent all-star superteams from forming. Teams in the highest number divisions, such as 14, usually have a difficult time fielding a full roster. They have open lanes in A meets, few year-round swimmers, and are in areas with more families with tighter pursestrings for discretionary budgets. But if you want to privately investigate and stop these rule breakers, it sounds like a good use of your time. [/quote] Listen, I don’t disagree with your snark about my question. But here’s the thing: Goose and Gander. So it’s okay for a D15 team to do this but not D3 because they can fill lanes? It’s either legal or not under NVSL bylaws, and allowing an exception to the rules for small teams in lower divisions creates a precedent for all teams to do the same. And then we’re back to D1 recruitment-despite-10-year-wait-list debates.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
