Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Republicans target a federal anti-hunger program as they prepare Trump’s tax cuts for the rich"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I've been looking at the Medicaid bill in detail. A lot of it is intended to make it harder for people to even enroll, gets rid of the 3 month lookback when applying for medicaid (usually they will cover medical bills going back 3 months), the whole pain is to make it burdensome and difficult (while they also get rid of efforts to improve rural internet). People will give up, they will get sicker, they will end up in the hospital where social workers help them re-apply for benefits which they will again have trouble maintaining. Rural providers will be even more hard hit. Some of this is because a very large percentage of Medicaid recipients are in managed care--either through medicaid expansion or because medicaid pays for their medicare advantage coverage, which should be prohibited if on medicaid. This can lead to overpayment through autopayments when people move to a different state or pass away. But that's an issue for insurers and the federal agency to resolve, not put it on the backs of the poor. More regs for the poor and none for the rich is apiece of this. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics