Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Venezuelans deported to CECOT"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]So we all get on the same page about due process and about asylum, can we start with the ones who are not "scary-looking"? We can start with those who were in the US legally, having applied for asylum. Reuters analyzed the cases of 50 of the deportees and 27 of them had pending immigration court dates!! Over half of the 50 they looked at. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/trump-deported-238-venezuelans-el-salvador-dozens-have-active-asylum-cases-2025-04-01/ These people are NOT ILLEGAL. These people have been already been interviewed by a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) asylum officer for a credible fear interview and were found to have a credible fear of persecution or torture. To the Karoline Leavitt impersonator or anyone defending these deportations, please explain how it is legal, ethical, or in any way ok to: 1. disregard a USCIS officer's initial finding that there is a significant possibility the person could be eligible for asylum 2. violate International law (the principle of non-refoulement) (in this case, I would think being sent to a human rights abusing prison is at the very least comparable to being sent to their own country where there is a credible fear of persecution or torture) 3. violate due process, guaranteed to all persons in our Constitution I don't see how any of these is defensible. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics