Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Sanctions for DOJ Lawyers’ Frivolous Arguments?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I know many of the lawyers at DOJ right now are excellent career attorneys who are hanging on by a thread. My heart truly goes out to them! And … the arguments some making in defense of the Trump administration are frivolous at best and more likely blatantly anti-Constitutional and straight-up dangerous. Yes, I understand that someone needs to defend this administration. But it’s a question of how. At some point aren’t these insane arguments sanctionable?? Rule 11 is still a thing right? Are there other sanctions available as a deterrent to this kind of anti-Constitutional craziness? From Slate: Does the “mandate of the electorate” give the president absolute power to defy the courts? https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2025/03/trump-boasberg-constitutional-crisis-latest-doj-king.html [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
