Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "GT criteria change? "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Not that much more strict, really, and certainly more flexible. Places the ability-related metric at the center for those grades where it is available. The greater problem is fidelity to robust and consistently employed enrichments to meet the GT-related need. When outcomes from having been provided ELC or AIM/HIGH (or some alternate/successor curricula generally considered as checking the box for the COMAR mandate for providing GT education) become similar to outcomes from having been lotteried in to an elementary CES or criteria-based magnet MS, that would be some indication that MCPS is taking things seriously. Ditto when an identified student at a school without a particularly manageable local cohort of similarly able peers is afforded reasonably similar curricular options with reasonably similar frequency and depth as those identified where there [i]is[/i] an easily managed cohort.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
