Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Travel Discussion
Reply to "Los Angeles?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I wouldn't go. There's the active fire risk, the air quality, and then there's just the fact that resources are needed for LA residents.[/quote] Los Angeles is fine. Yes some people lost their house but it is a very small part of Los Angeles. Most of the fires are in the hills. It has 3.8 million people and a GDP of 1.3 trillion. That is a higher population vs 22 states and a higher GDP vs 45 states. Los Angeles is 4,084 square miles Hughes Fire Fire Size: 10,396 acres 56% contained Eaton Fire Fire Size: 14,021 acres, 95% contained Palisades Fire Fire Size: 23,448 acres, 77% contained 47,000 acres burned mostly in the hills. Los Angeles is 2,613,760 acres. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
