Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Stay-to-Play Hotel-Booking Requirements: Varsity Brands Lawsuit"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I don't think so. Usually, there are many different hotel choices (i.e. different chains/brands) and price points in the stay to play tournaments, so you don't really see that only hotel brand must be booked and you don't see price fixing. With stay to play, the tournament uses a travel company, who gives teams different hotel brands and some variance in pricing. This isn't to say it can't ever be found to be an antitrust violation, but I just don't think it's likely. Also, note that the case you're talking about, it's a settlement in a federal district court case, not a court decision, and so the settlement is ONLY binding on the parties to the settlement. The settlement wouldn't even apply to other cases arising in the district.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
