Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Stay-to-Play Hotel-Booking Requirements: Varsity Brands Lawsuit"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Anybody here both a soccer parent and an antitrust expert, and know whether last year's Varsity Brands settlement, [i]see[/i] [url=https://topclassactions.com/legal-industry/parents-varsity-brands-settle-cheerleading-antitrust-lawsuit-for-82-5m/]here[/url] and [url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/varsity-spirit-bain-pay-82-million-cheerleading-antitrust-settlement-2024-05-14/]here[/url], has had (or should be having) any effect on the widespread practice of tournament "stay to play" requirements? As an example, [url=https://beachfc.demosphere-secure.com/tournaments-1/spring-classic]here's the requirement[/url] for (Virginia) Beach FC's 2025 Virginia Beach Spring Classic tournament: [quote]Teams participating in the Tournament ARE REQUIRED to make all hotel accommodations using our tournament housing service. The tournament housing service is a free service and enables the City of Virginia Beach to ascertain tax revenue and in turn, helps with future grants to build/improve soccer field/facilities development. We encourage your support of developing facilities for youth players. Some hotels will offer single-night stays - check the listing on the website for this information.[/quote] This sort of tying or bundling across unrelated markets (soccer tournaments and hotels) has always struck me as anticompetitive, but I don't know antitrust law well enough to really gauge. It feels like, surely, thousands of soccer parents would have challenged this if the theory had legs. I also wonder what, exactly, "enables the [c]ity ... to [i]ascertain[/i] tax revenue" is supposed to mean. Like, is Virginia Beach [i]actually[/i] applying some sort of special, additional tax on tournament participants, beyond the standard hospitality taxes? Or is this just a weaselly way for the organizers to [i]imply[/i] that's the case when it isn't?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics