Reply to HS volleyball

Forum Index » Volleyball

Reply to "HS volleyball"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Equity.

Wonder if the school board is planning to subsidize club costs for potential varsity players who can’t afford that edge provided by club experience that allows girls to make the varsity team?. Whats the economic diversity makeup of that varsity team? Whats the racial diversity makeup?

Some will answer that it doesn’t matter and it’s all about skill. But what if acquiring the skill requires paying $5-6000 in club fees plus $5-8000 in hotel and travel fees in the off-season in order to have a shot at playing on the varsity team at the local high school?

Equity is certainly not at the center of this. Because it’s sports.

And yet the school board is bending over backward to make sure that equity GRADING is a thing, so that academically-advantaged kids no longer have an advantage.[/quote]
I can't tell whether you're trying to make a point about equity grading or actually proposing that schools should be subsidizing out of school extracurricular activities.

I think it's pretty clear that in order to make varsity at most high schools with competitive teams, playing club volleyball is required. And yes club volleyball is expensive and a huge commitment of time and other resources.  I agree there probably isn't a lot of economic diversity among girls playing volleyball, but there's been a huge increase in racial diversity and at least at my DD's school, the racial makeup of the varsity volleyball team pretty closely mirrors the racial makeup of the school as a whole.

As to whether a school should subsidize club volleyball for some number of students, that seems really unworkable for a variety of reasons. How many girls are on a HS varsity volleyball roster - maybe 15?  In a school with say 2,000 kids, should school resources be spent to give a handful of girls a better chance to compete for a spot on the team? Why volleyball and not other extracurricular activities?  Should schools also be subsidizing other sports, music lessons, or voice lessons? I'd guess the kid who gets first chair violin in the school orchestra or the lead in the school musical take private lessons. That also seems unfair to the kids whose families can afford lessons. Aren't school resources better spent on initiatives that impact more of the student body?[/quote]
DP here. 
They are clearly talking about how merit seems to be the overriding concern in sports but not in academics.

In sports it's about what you bring to the table.  
In academics we trying to divine what you would bring to the table is you put in the same effort and had the same resources as others.

If you rank ordered schools by income level, you would get a pretty good approximation of the quality of the volleyball team or any sport other than football or basketball.
The same is true for academics.  
But sometimes the effort put in by athletes are portrayed as meritorious and the efforts put in by good students are portrayed as exploiting privilege.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics