Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
ยป
Political Discussion
Reply to "Harris interview with MSNBC Sept 25 - 24minute video"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Q1: 2 minutes. Economic plan. 0 information provided. Q2: 2minutes. Trump economy: attacked Trump's performance in plan Q3: 2 minutes Trump's tax model expires. What's next? No tax increases for people earning under $400K. Unclear if that's related to Trump's tax, or post-expiration model. Child tax credit. Corporate tax and billionaire tax raise. No specific proposal. Q4: 2 minutes How to build more housing, not just subsidizing prices? Tax incentives. "3 million more units". "Reduce red tape" . "Do something eth transit dollars". No details or examples. "Holistic". Q5: 2 minutes Liberty Bell in PA. Japanese company.(Some steel plant? What is this issue?) "Rah rah steel and steelworker.s." Half time. Unions next. [/quote] If this is your standard, then you have a much higher bar for her than for Trump. Judge them on the same standard and the comparison isn't close, but if you are going to grade Trump on a curve, then that is the bias coming through. She provided information regarding her economic plan and compared and contrasted that to Trump's. Regarding the tax structure, yes,of course the idea is there would be a revision to the tax code with support of the House and Senate. That should be obvious. regarding housing, she has already talked about this before - she wants to provide block grants to states and cities and has now added the idea of incentivizing development around transit, which makes a lot of sense and builds on policy from the Obama Administration. You can say "blah blah" but when Hillary and Elizabeth Warren got into wonky explanations, they got called wonky and people shouted "b-o-r-i-n-g" so it is a no win here. This was a short interview, how much detail are you looking for? On US Steel - she makes it clear she wants US Steel to remain in US ownership. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics