Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Expectant and Postpartum Moms
Reply to "C-section vs Vaginal induction "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I feel like inductions are fine for anybody who has given birth vaginally already, but for FTMs they often end in unplanned or emergency C-sections. If I had to choose between a C-section after a TOL or a planned C, I would definitely choose the planned C.[/quote] So much wrong with this. Inductions in FTM’s do not “often” end in c sections. OP should follow her medical advice for her specific situations but what you are saying is just factually wrong. [/quote] If you think 36% of the time (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/birt.12286) isn't "often" then we disagree on the meaning of words. That's plenty "often" for me to use the word in an online discussion board, particularly compared to the 14% rate for multiparous women (note: this study actually found it was 42% of FTMs that end up with a C-section after induction - still not often enough for you? https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x#:~:text=The%20emergency%20cesarean%20section%20rate,3.02)%20(Table%202).) OP was asking for advice from commenters, not her doctor. And that's what I provided (now with statistics and citations for the peanut gallery!). You can provide your own advice or move along, but you can't shout me down with accusations of factual inaccuracy that are not true.[/quote] Inductions actually LOWER your risk of a c section compared to waiting for labor. https://www.nih.gov/news-events/news-releases/induced-labor-39-weeks-may-reduce-likelihood-c-section-nih-study-suggests [/quote] You're trying to quote the ARRIVE study, which is specifically limited to induction at 39 weeks for low-risk pregnancies. OP is talking about a "complicated pregnancy" and based on my reading (which may be incorrect, it's a bit vague) an offer of an induction at 38 weeks.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics