Reply to C-section vs Vaginal induction

Forum Index » Expectant and Postpartum Moms

Reply to "C-section vs Vaginal induction "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I've been given the option based off of our complicated pregnancy to do an elective C-section at 38 weeks or trial of labor if I wish with an induction.

My initial thought is if my water happens to break on its own I would attempt a trial of labor ( no forceps or vacuum and pivot to a section the first sign of distress for baby) but if not and we reach induction date I'd prefer a planned section.

I'm not tied to a vaginal birth experience even though this is likely our one and only. My main concern is getting baby out the safest most efficient way without causing her any distress.

I know in the best case scenario vaginal birth is "better" for baby and a better recovery but what about not best case. I know labor can stall and baby can have complications if stuck or say placental abruption or uterine rupture, or 3rd and 4th degree tearing or other complications my body. And other risks for C-section - respiratory issues and higher bleeding risk for me although baby has been given beta for lungs already and I'm already a hemorrhage risk so they at least know that and will be prepped.

For those who have done both - what recovery was better? What did you feel was safest for your baby? And how do you feel when comparing the two.

Ultimately I think I'm comfortable with our plan and I do believe a planned section will be way more controlled and easier than an emergency section but I have a few more days to weigh my options.

Also did anyone get a tap block or use a pressure wound after their C-section?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics