Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "The 10% President"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]FB friends today are circulating an article in the WSJ says Obama ducking responsibility for fiscal situation. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444358804578016270614705726.html?fb_action_ids=10151182705592148&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582 Factcheck.org has a more nuanced take on who is responsible for what: http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/obamas-spending-inferno-or-not/ My question, [b]didn't Obama try to take responsibility for the fiscal situation with the Report on Fiscal Responsibility[/b]: http://www.fiscalcommission.gov/news Also known as Simpson Bowles, which was [b]bi-partisan legislation voted down by obstructionist republicans???[/b] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Commission_on_Fiscal_Responsibility_and_Reform "The original proposal for a commission came from bipartisan legislation that would have required Congress to vote on its recommendations as presented, without any amendment. In January 2010, that bill failed in the Senate by a vote of 53–46, when six Republicans who had co-sponsored it nevertheless voted against it" - Wikipedia Can someone please tell me if my understanding is correct??? Thanks.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics