Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Romney as One Term President?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=jsteele]Yesterday on Meet the Press, this conversation took place: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48959273/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts/#.UE5z2qTyYz5 GREGORY: You know you could be a very unpopular president if you make tough choices that you say you'll make. If it came to it, if the only way to achieve a deal on the debt, on this fiscal cliff, was to endanger yourself politically to the point that you were a one term president, would you be satisfied with that? MR. ROMNEY: David, I could not care less about my political prospects. I want to become president of the United States to get this country on the right track again. America is at a critical crossroads. We have to strengthen the foundation of our economy, of our values, of our principles so we have a military that's so strong we can defend freedom for ourselves and for others. We've got to put Americans back to work. And politics, and-- and whether I am highly favored, not highly favored, just doesn't enter into the equation. GREGORY: Would you be-- would you be satisfied with one term if you could get a deal on averting a fiscal cliff? MR. ROMNEY: Let me tell you, if I can get this country on track again I'd be satisfied with anything. Here is how I interpret this: 1) Romney realizes that -- as Senator Graham recently put it -- there aren't enough "angry white guys" to get him elected. Therefore, he needs to move to the center; 2) Moving to the center will cost him "angry white guy" support; 3) Angry white guys may conclude that 4 more years of Obama would provide a better opportunity for a "true conservative" to win in 2016 then 4 years of Romney; 4) Romney is now responding to that idea by suggesting that he would only be around for 4 years. My conclusion is that Romney is trying to put a bug in the ears of angry white guys suggesting that they can vote for him and still have the chance to vote for a "true conservative" in 2016. But, something tells me that angry white guys are not stupid enough to fall for this. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics