Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Are you better off than four years ago? (in two easy graphics) "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]I just ran across an interesting pair of charts that give the Dem and Repub answer to this question. Here is the Dem version, showing steady improvement in the private sector jobs data: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/09/04/answering-the-are-you-better-off-question-in-1-chart-obama-edition/ Here is the Repub version, showing the drop in HHI (red line) and rise in unemployment (black line) from Jan 2000 through May 2012: [img]http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/files/2012/09/Screen-shot-2012-09-04-at-11.59.32-AM.png[/img] I have two comments/questions, and I'm curious to hear reaction. 1. I'm a Dem, so probably somewhat biased. When I look at the Repub chart, it's striking to me how weak the economy was throughout the entire Bush2 presidency. Before looking at this chart, I'd have guessed the economy in the 2005-07 period was marginally stronger than it had been when Bush2 took office. But in fact, it was somewhat weaker than 2000. And the real killer period for the economy seems to be in the year before Obama took office. It actually seems as if Obama might be in the process of pulling the economy out of its tailspin. But as I said, I'm probably biased, so maybe I see that data in a way Repubs might not. For my Repub friends, how do you read those numbers? What reasonable (not ridiculous talking points) view do you have? Do you also view the economy's nosedive as having begun during Bush2? Do you view the ugly 2009-12 period as Obama's "fault"? 2. The only reasonable message I've heard so far from some Repubs is that while the tanking economy was not Obama's fault, Obama should be faulted for not having taken steps to solve the problem faster. If that's your view, what sort of steps do you think should have been taken? I cannot find any Repubs who will specify what steps would have turned the economy around faster, which makes me skeptical and suspicious that it's just a talking point and not a fact-based claim. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics