Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Arlington and Mclean Arguments"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]McLean and Arlington are locked in a forever deathmatch with each other with competing in youth soccer because of their proximity and both like to beat their chests all the time. Here is some food for thought: At higher socio-economic levels, you see stronger girls teams, but weaker boys teams if no recruiting from the outside is done. At lower socioeconomic levels, you see a lot more boys talent and lesser girls participation in soccer in general. Arlington is large enough to have pockets of both - Arlington's top boys talent mostly come from certain areas of the county where kids are out on soccer fields playing pickup with adults all the time. What you do not see are younger girls wandering onto soccer fields playing with teenage boys or adults who are strangers. So instead, parents hire private trainers for their daughters and sign them up for every program they can find, and get them on teams early training 11 months of the year. Arlington is large enough to support soccer on both sides just by numbers alone, mclean is not.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics